Xtrememind Psionics :: God Caster Schumann Psioncs Generator (reply)

[admin]

pristinechi wrote at 07 Sep 2011 07:39 AM GMT: ATG1200, wow! A top end powerhorse from Welz. Wish I can own one.

A radionics maker named Dr Joseph Max gave a very intesting take on radionic when a guy commented that coils should be used in certain ways.

http://josephmax.wordpress.com/2010/...mus_machine_1/

The operator of the device is the secret to success in shaping the reality you want.

</span> Quote:
josephmax says:

I think there are limits to trying to analyze aetheric “energies” as if there is a direct relationship to electromagnetism. Radionics is not electronics. It has little to do with energy as a physicist describes it. This was the error made by the earliest researchers and it’s continued to the present day. It’s a seductive idea because electronics becomes ever more sophisticated and complex, more “miraculous” all the time.

Electronics also becomes ever more miniaturized, but radionics operates on a much more “macro” scale.

I’m not saying that we all might as well throw out the boxes and go totally, stark raving psionic, and just draw everything on paper or computer screens. The material basis of copper, glass, wood, bakelite, plastics and silicon do serve a useful purpose. But they are only useful as the conveyance of something completely non-electronic, what I’ve come to call “aetheric information transception”, because I’m trying to get away from using the ill-fitting terms of electronics and physics.

Even Dr. Hieronymus stated that the ratings (pF) of the air-tuning capacitors in the circuits he designed are irrelevant, or at least allow for a very wide range of workable values. So how can this be, if the size and windings of the coils are so crucial that one more or less turn or a small change in diameter will make a radionic instrument less effective, or even unworkable? What exactly is a radionics device “tuning” to?

Simple: it’s tuning to the operator. The person using it is an indispensable part of the system. The human nervous system has a very wide tuning range, and can accommodate a lot of variation.

Anyone who really does the work I’m sure will agree that using a radionics device is a learning experience. It’s not automatic. It’s more like learning to play a musical instrument than learning to operate a radio. Some people have a natural knack for it, others have to work hard and practice a lot, and a few people will simply never be able to do it. That’s not a moral failing or anything, it’s like saying not everybody can play the guitar.

(Dr. Hieronymus himself admitted he was not a very good operator of his own machines. But luckily for him, each of his wives were.)

The point being that the minutiae of radio technology, calculating frequency resonances and values of coils and so on are less relevant to radionic instruments than they are to electronics. Radionic devices are “macro” in nature, and seem to work better with abundant wire, knobs, prisms, loops, crystals and such. The bigger the better – many devices are meant to interface with the magnetic field of the planet, and it doesn’t get any bigger than that!

The devices serve two purposes. They are conduits and “amplifiers”, and they give the human nervous system something to tune to. Lots of different devices can make music, but not until humans take it up and adapt themselves to that particular instrument and the way it’s played. Then the music comes out.

When I build my instruments, there is a lot of subjective, “artistic” intuition that goes into it. Example: Bill Jensen winds his well coils with wide gaps. I wound mine tightly, because, well, it felt better to me. It was an aesthetic choice, a “brush stoke” in the creation of the piece. I think these considerations are more important than the calculated electrical values. (By the way, Willem, I’ve seen Bill Jensen’s coils and the windings around the dowel are definitely not wound tightly, so that will certainly alter your calculations on coil height.)

I think that we, as aetheric artists, magicians and researchers, can fall into a trap of trying to apply theories of electronics in some kind of direct, or even indirect, causal relationship with radionics. We aren’t pushing electrons. We’re pushing aetheric information. The instruments can be designed and constructed with very “broad strokes”, so to speak, and be powerfully effective in the hands of a skilled operator. What we should be putting our efforts into is making better operators, not just better devices.

Ask Uncle Chuckie Cosimano. He does everything with shoeboxes, oatmael cans and flashlights. And helmets. Lots of helmets.
<span class="postbody">

More...