Published on 05/9/2008

This work is the result of 25 years of consistent work looking at living systems as
operating on the basis of quantum computers. This is known as quantum biology, and
there is significant backing, academically, to support this idea.

How do Living Systems relate to this?

There is a wealth of evidence which indicates that living systems work as quantum
computers. Certain features of living systems give them the hardware in order to
perform in such a way. The main areas that do this are as follows :
3
1. Connective Tissue
Connective tissue , made from collagen, is liquid crystalline in nature. Collagen
molecules can line up with each other to form coherent channels of
communication.
2. Coherence
This is the property by which living systems can transmit information
instantaneously, so every bit knows what every other bit is doing, and the
holistic nature of any living organism arises at a quantum level due to this
connectedness.
3. The probable existence of super conductivity at body temperatures.
4. The probability that water acts as the information carrier and storage system
for the quantum software.
Recent theoretical physics work on the replication of DNA, which is the fundamental
genetic material, makes it inevitable that the body must work as a quantum computer
as there are so many billions of possibilities of combination of various base pairs to make
genes, that essentially the body would have to run through all those billions of
possibilities, making billions of calculations in parallel. 99.9999% of all these
calculations would yield a wrong answer, and only one would be right. It’s only by this
sort of awesome computing power that we can replicate DNA within minutes. If we
didn’t have this ability, it would take us several months to make a white cell. Whereas in
fact it only takes a few minutes to make the genetic material in order to produce a white
cell.
In energy terms, living systems are nearly 100% efficient. It takes a system with
quantum informational characteristics to have such efficiency. Internal combustion
engines have, at best, 30% efficiency.
How does all of this apply to Cancer Diagnosis?
The author of this paper, together with an Australian colleague (Peter Fraser from
Sydney), had been working independently for some years and in the last 3 years
together developing testing systems which look at the body from a quantum point of
view. These are collectively called electro dermal testing systems which measure
electrical changes over acupuncture points. The results are notably variable, changeable
and have some degree of randomness. The reasons for all of this are explained in the
previous paragraphs. The author has a patent on an objective way of doing this testing
(UK Patent GB 2284889B entitled ‘Skin Impedance Measurement Device for
Determining the correct choice of Medication’). Peter Fraser has a range of intellectual
properties and also has built an electronic model of the hydrogen atom which is
fundamental to this work, both of these are patentable but are not patented at the
present time. Electrodermal testing systems, to some extent, produce random
results and that is directly connected with the randomness of quantum systems as
described earlier in this paper. I have had a conventional statistical study done on
4
electrodermal testing techniques, using what is in our terms fairly crude electrodermal
testing equipment, known as the Vega test, published as a leading article in the British
Medical Journal on 25th January 2001, (‘Is Electrodermal Testing as effective as Skin
Prick Tests for diagnosing Allergies? A double blind, randomised block design study ‘ –
George Lewith, Julian Kenyon et al). This study showed that this electrodermal testing
system was not accurate in picking up these sensitivities.

Our Results and Testing for the Presence of Cancer using developed

Our Results and Testing for the Presence of Cancer using developed
Electrodermal Testing Equipment
We have so far carried out two pilot studies using cotton wool tongue swabs on a ‘blind’
basis. The first of these studies involved approximately 100 patients, and yielded a
diagnostic accuracy as to the presence of cancer or not of 90%. The second study
involved 45 participants, and yielded a diagnostic accuracy of just less than 90% in
detecting the presence of cancer or not. It is impossible to ignore the accuracy of these
findings and the potential of the equipment used to make such findings. We wish to
develop this equipment, with appropriate backing from scientists working in the area of
quantum computing and quantum physicists, and state-of-the-art computer
technology.
Peter Fraser has deduced through this testing a whole range of phenomena basic to the
cancer process, and also a range of tantalising glimpses of completely novel ways of
dealing with cancer. In essence, what has been found is that the body is described in
physics terms as a quantum wave function. This means that it is a vast collection of
waves all interacting with each other, the Interaction of one wave with all the other
waves constituting a quantum wave function which makes a living system, is known as
‘Phase’. The phase relationship therefore of these waves is fundamental and therein
contains the information necessary to produce a human being or any other living system
as a co-ordinated system. When an illness happens, the phase relationship in some way
goes out of phase, so essentially any chronic illness in general, and cancer in particular, is
a quantum software problem. It is my contention that when something goes wrong with
our computers we look at the software, we don’t take an axe to the back of the
computer. In essence, the way that conventional medicine deals with cancer is to take
an axe to the back of the computer. The therapeutic outcome of all of this work is we will
begin to get glimpses into what the quantum software is , and be able to manipulate
that in order to put the quantum wave function back into phase. This will produce
absolutely total cure. In my own field of cancer work at the moment, I am using immuno
therapy, which looks at the immune system to produce remission in cancer. This is
totally different to the conventional approach, where the process of cell killing or
removal of tumours through chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, is the prime
method. However, with patients who go through our immuno therapy programme, even
though they seem to do better than using conventional approaches alone, are still so far
as the testing systems we have used here in order to do our cancer diagnosis, are as
likely to remit back into the cancer state as any patient treated conventionally. So
therefore immuno therapy is a big step forward, but the real Holy Grail lies in the
quantum software.
5
One of the most important phenomena discovered by my colleague Peter Fraser in
relationship to cancer, is that there appears to be a problem with the hydrogen atom, in
all patients with cancer. Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe , and is
fundamental to biological systems, as all biological molecules have hydrogen. Hydrogen
bonding is central to protein folding, enzymes are proteins, and the spatial form of any
enzyme is fundamental to its normal activity. Hydrogen bonding is also essential in
order to enable new DNA to be made, a process known as DNA replication. In cancer, the
hydrogen atom goes through an energy shift to a higher energy level. This is known as
the ‘Lamb Shift’. This is described by a physicist called Lamb in 1947. The Lamb shift can
be looked up on the Internet, and it states that it is due to activity in the virtual realm,
that is the realm of the vacuum, in physics terms that is the background radiation which
is present throughout the universe in which particles are created and destroyed in nano
seconds. This virtual activity in the cancer situation pushes the hydrogen atom up
through a Lamb Shift which can be detected using a spectrometer to a higher energy
level. This means that in cancer, enzymatic activities are abnormal and DNA replication
is also abnormal, which is actually what we find in conventional terms. Cancer is also a
high energy process. For example, there is increased light emission from the body and in
particular from tumours of patients with cancer, this is well described. Also, there is
increased heat emission from cancer patients. When patients die with cancer, they go
through a progress of gradual fundamental organ failure, particularly the liver and the
kidney, and this process is known as cachexia. This in physics terms is a very slow and
inexorable self combustion due to the high energy cancer state. Cancer causing
phenomena such as ionising radiation, positive ionisation caused by man made
electricity, toxins etc., are all of high energy status. Complementary cancer therapies
which are becoming more popular, have tended to focus around aromatherapy, massage,
counselling etc. These are basically all sedating techniques from a therapeutic point of
view. This is exactly why one would expect them to work from a physics point of view, and
indeed they do seem to produce some improvement in the cancer process.
SUMMARY
We have developed a prototype system for looking at the body as an information
system based upon quantum computing ideas. We have been able to produce accurate
results on a ‘blind’ basis. We’ve also been able to produce diagnostic insights and indeed
therapeutic insights into the treatment of cancer, and a range of other chronic
diseases. It is our belief that if this system is developed in its totality then we can
produce commercial hardware and software if we have a small full time team operating
within the UK over a period of 4 years.

Dr. Julian Kenyon, February 2001.
Quantum biology paper 2302

Introduction

Introduction
This work is the result of 25 years of consistent work looking at living systems as
operating on the basis of quantum computers. This is known as quantum biology, and
there is significant backing, academically, to support this idea.
Conventional bio-medical science focuses exclusively on the pathological and biochemical
aspects of biology. This is an approach which works, but there is a deeper reality which
could yield significant diagnostic insights.

The following is drawn from my own theoretical work, and that of, in particular, the work
of Zeilinger at the University of Vienna, who has demonstrated with his research group
several futuristic phenomena such as quantum teleportation and quantum encryption.
Much of his work and ideas crystallise the work I have been doing.
Quantum theory describes the world with astonishing precision, whether applied to
elementary particles a hundred thousand times smaller than atoms, or to currents
super conducting rings a billion times bigger. The most fundamental element of the
quantum world is essentially quantisation, the notion that energy, spin and other
quantities only come in discrete steps. Therefore the world at its most fundamental
level is in effect rather grainy, rather like a lots of pixels on a digital picture. Another
enigma is the probabilistic nature of the quantum world, and this is at odds with the
classical world of definite physical properties. This is particularly relevant in the work we
are doing, in that the results are not as definitive as we would like. Culturally, we all like
definite outcomes. This fuels much of the current interest in genetic engineering, the
human genome etc. However, if one looks in detail into the world of genetics and genetic
engineering, one will find that the outcomes there are also very much probabilistic and
are not definitive at all, this is simply a smoke screen to keep the investors pouring the
money into the bio-technology industry, which they are doing at the current time. For a
high quality book on this, with appropriate references, see ‘Genetic Engineering –
Dreams or Nightmares?’ by Mae-Wan Ho.

In the quantum world there are many strange phenomena, such as entanglement, that is
the profound connectedness of objects and processes across infinite distances, and
super position, the astonishing proposition that an electron can be in two places at
once, a current can flow simultaneously clockwise and anti clockwise, until you actually
look to see which way the current is flowing or where the electron is. This process is
known as collapsing the wave function, and the simple process of observation produces
a definitive result. The specific science underlying the work we’ve been doing over the
past 25 years is quantum electrodynamics (QED), which essentially describes how
photons (packets of light), can influence electrons.
2

What we are proposing, is that information is fundamental, and information itself has as
much reality as electricity and magnetism do. We live in an age of information, and we
depend increasingly on information technology. The whole reason I’m able to send you
this e-mail is dependent on that.

The ‘atom’ of information is the bit, the quantity contained in the answer to a Yes or No
question. This is the only way we can interrogate nature, rather like a lawyer
interrogates a witness. There are a whole series of questions posed to which there is
either one or the other answer. So in information terms, an elementary particle, billions
of time smaller than an atom, can only give one or other answer. Once that answer has
been given, then essentially, for example, the position of that particular particle be it an
electron comes into reality. Then we call this the collapse of the wave function. So
where does the intrinsic randomness found in the quantum world arise? To that end,
consider the spin of an electron. Say it is measured along a vertical axis (call it the ‘z’
axis, three dimensional space has three axis, called the ‘x’, ‘y’ and ‘z’ axis), and found to be
pointing up. Because one bit of information has been used to make that statement, no
more information can be carried by the electron spin. Consequently, no information is
available to predict the amounts of spin in the other two axis (the ‘x’ and ‘y’). So those
amounts of spin are of necessity entirely random. If you then measure the spin in one of
these directions, there is an equal chance of it pointing right or left, forward or back.
This fundamental randomness is what we call ‘Heisenderg’s Uncertainly Principle’. We
believe with the work we are doing, that living systems have found a way around this
uncertainty. Therefore the idea of information here is attached to a single elementary
system, that can be on electron, a photon or whatever you like. This explains the
phenomenon of entanglement where two particles which have been together at one point
and should become separated to the opposite ends of the universe, they are so-called
entangled, because it is impossible, even in principle, to describe the state of one
without knowing the state of the other. So even though they are spatially separate by
vast distances potentially, they have no independent existence. This has been proven in
experiment. So therefore the graininess of reality is to do with the fact that we can
only get Yes or No answers to properties of any elementary system.

I agree with Zeilinger in the respect that a new theory of quantum information is needed
if we are able to handle the quantum computers of the future. This technology promises
one day to perform calculations far faster than ordinary computers as billions of
calculations can be carried on in parallel. This exploits the system of the quantum world
to be in more than one state at the same time. Physicists call the building blocks of
their planned quantum computers ‘qubits’. A qubit is simply an elementary system such
as an electron spin. Because a qubit can be in a super position of several states, it must
hold not only classical information, that is information giving its actual position in three
dimensional space, or some other measurement such as mass, but some more elusive
kind of quantum information too.