- Home
- Quantum Biology
- Bioenergetic concepts in Pathology
- Home
- Researchers
- Peter Fraser
- Bioenergetic concepts in Pathology
- Home
- Bioenergetic Devices
- NES Nutri Energetics Systems
- Bioenergetic concepts in Pathology
- Home
- Biophysics
- Bioenergetic concepts in Pathology
Bioenergetic concepts in Pathology
- By Peter Fraser
- Published 06/18/2007
- Quantum Biology
-
Rating:




A BIOENERGETIC THEORY OF GENERAL PATHOLOGY
In studying the arrangement of the electron as suggested by Milo Wolff, it soon became apparent that we might be able to read off more information than we previously could from the Infoceuticals themselves. When, in our theoretical model, spin was abandoned, and replaced by the phase shift between a possible zero degrees and 180 degrees, it became possible to assess the Infoceuticals differently.
In early 2006, measurements were made on the Integrators, after it was found that, by doing a few preliminary tests, the matching was set up for sequence to the left or sequence to the right, which is something that makes the “phase” values appear. It is assumed that the numerical values refer to degrees.
We have here an explanation at last for the system apparently “ending” at Compartment 12. You can see that the phase values are almost all neutral over the frequency range. The Integrators are then giving some stability to the energy system of the body.
Compartment Number
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 -5
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
In the arrangement of the energy using Wolff’s theory, these 12 compartments relate to powers of ten in frequency that are representative of the “outward” or exploratory wave.
It means that the out-wave from the heart, the one that appears to activate the DNA and RNA, is very sensitive to phase error, and this indeed may be what is able to damage the DNA beyond repair in the case of cancer.
If you think that is far fetched, then consider the case of a phenomenon called cavitation, a process that can completely destroy ship’s propellers, simply by the phase error which occurs because of the movement of the propeller in the water. Over a time, the propeller is destroyed, even if made of strong metal alloys.
So it is of interest to consider cancer as biphasic, the first phase being the destruction of the arrangement of the phase of the out-wave, or the 12 compartments, followed thereafter by the similar destruction of the in-wave, the one that will be more likely to create havoc in the DNA , the chromosomes and anything that is at all orderly. Hence primary cancer is followed sometimes by secondary cancer.
Indeed there is no need to consider this scenario as some special case of cancer, but as a general theory of disease, which is indeed biphasic, so that there are clearly observable stages of a disease, which of course until now were e completely unexplainable.
So what about the theory of the secondary phase of cancer being due to the cells migrating form one part of the body to another? It is a great theory but no one has ever detected over the decades of this theory any of the cancerous germinal cells in the blood.
Instead we have a new way of looking at it: the severely phase shifted backwave, or the in-wave, will upset the corresponding out-wave starting with Compartment 12, giving a secondary growth in the pancreas or liver, then Compartment 11, giving a secondary growth in the marrow or stomach, then Compartment 10, giving a secondary growth in the Circulatory system, Compartment 9, the thyroid, and so on.
This means, according to logic, that no one will ever recover from secondary cancer where the primary growth has not been cured or excised. This fits with reality.
What wave are we talking about? I mean the aggregated whole body wave, and immensely complex aggregation of all the aspects of our body, all in a single simplified unitary wave.
If I am right, I should be able to do a test of the markers for primary and secondary cancer. I predict that primary cancer will show an advanced phase shift, or a move to the right, and secondary cancer will show a negative phase error, or a shift to the left.
- We are looking for a medicine that makes sense.
Many times in the case of allopathic medicine it is necessary to suspend the function of the intellect in order to accept the latest theory, one which we know will have its place in the sun, perhaps for a decade, only to pass on into the oblivion it deserves.
Scientific American put out a Special Edition, a few years ago, entitled promisingly “The Science of Staying Young”. It should have been called “The Science of Staying Alive” because it was actually about cancer research.
Apparently there are now six things that allopathic research doesn’t understand about cancer, according to W W Gibbs, July 2003. We are glad it’s only six. For “don’t understand” read “does not fit biochemical model of medicine”.
Problem 1.
The “go” signals for cell division are not understood. Yet mitotic radiation, a feature of cell division, is surely a field effect, given the word “radiation.” So why are we looking for a chemical answer to a bioenergetic problem? Body cells need a start and stop message form the body field to control the morphology of the body. So surely logic would have it that if cancer cells do not have such signals (at least, stop signals), then what we need is to find the energetic shield that cancer cells use to block the human body field messages.
Already there is little doubt in my mind that the answer to pathology lies in correcting cellular phase error of the electron in specific areas of body field activity. Normal cells and cancerous sells will have different phase characteristics.
Problem 2.
The neighboring cells when squeezed by cancerous tissues issue “stop growth” messages. These will of course be in biochemical messages, but they meet their target by field effect. The message may well be a phase value. The cancerous tissue does not respond to these stop growth messages, simply for a bioenergetic reason.
Problem 3.
In normal cells, when genetic damage reaches a certain level, the cell will destroy itself, or, to put it more clearly, it will die. This rule does not apply to cancerous cells either. Is this a problem of genetics or of field switching mechanisms?
Problem 4.
Tumours need oxygen and blood-borne nutrients to survive. New branches of the blood vessels are sent out to irrigate the cancerous tissues. This means that an aspect of the circulatory branching activity is unable to distinguish body tissue from cancerous tissue. This does not really sound like a genetic error problem, but a field matching problem.
Problem 5.
While normal cells will die after about 70 cell divisions, cancerous cells can divide for longer periods. So cancer cells lack the same switching mechanisms found in normal cells. Is this a switch created by the body field?
Problem 6.
At a certain stage, the cells of the cancer are supposed to magically get up, detach themselves from their tissue home, and go into the blood and find another organ. This is in spite of the fact that tissues don’t do this ever in normal human beings. The migrating cells have never been spotted, but we know they are doing it, maybe at night…. The bio-energetic theory concerning the electron function plus the idea of scaling will account for this without needing to have cells traveling in the blood.
So what’s wrong with cancer research? It was like giving the job of fireman to the local pyromaniac. Doctors have the capability of making cancer much more of a problem than it ever was. Would you expect a person with no knowledge of bioenergetics to solve a bioenergetic problem, even after a very, very long time?
Spread The Word
Article Series
-
Bioenergetic concepts in Pathology
Comments




















