Seven Principles of the Human Body Field

We are out at the frontiers of biology and physics with our theory of the human body-field, and we find many others with valid and intriguing ideas out there keeping us company. One such person is American astrophysicist Milo Wolff. I very much like his space resonance theory, and it supports NES theory very well. We came to Wolff’s theory long after I had begun my research—almost thirty years later in fact, but it supports us beautifully. I refer you to Wolff’s book, Exploring the Physics of the Unknown Universe, to find out more about his theory. I don’t have time to even begin to review it, but it proposes only three fundamental particles—the electron, proton and neutron—and says that all other particles are “appearances” caused by how the interaction of electrons (which are spherical scalar standing waves, having In waves and Out waves) interact and thus affect the configuration—or resonance—of space. We are, of course, not talking about three-dimensional space, but quantum space. But I leave it to you to learn about this by reading the physics.

Suffice it to say that the properties of space have not really been studied, although Wolff states that he thinks it’s about time they were.[1] When energy exchanges take place, information exchanges also take place via the interference patterns of electron In and Out waves, per Wolff’s theory. I can’t go into more depth about the physics here, but for information to be useful it has to be what you might call “structured.” In the 1990’s, long before I ever read Milo Wolff’s book, I was doing experiments with matching ampoules which contained liquid or matter that had been imprinted with messages of some sort, along the lines of homeopathic imprinting. My matching technique reveals that when two things—two samples in this case—“talk” to each other they exchange energy and thus impart information. I tested thousands of samples, usually of homeopathically imprinted materials, such as body tissues or minerals and such, and repeated these tests over and over, for nearly thirty years. I amassed mounds of data about what “talked to” (or matched) what, and what didn’t talk to what.

But what to do with all this data? How to organize it? From very ancient Chinese sources I finally gleaned the esoteric mathematical ideas needed to set up a test for ordinality and sequence in this mass of data. By “sequence” I mean matches being sorted in one direction or another, having a preferred order. Can you believe that we gained a matching response only when a sequence of ampoules of imprinted solution were arranged in the experiment in a certain order? It is strange. It boggled my mind for many, many years! But this is what happened, and the idea of the body-field was on its way, because without sequence, without order and structure, we don’t get meaningful matching effects.

Now don’t be too quick to dismiss this idea. It is not so odd, as it is crucial to biology in other respects, too. Think of DNA, with its four bases which can only be arranged in certain pairings. RNA, too. Think of the production of complex enzymes and hormones by the body, where these sequences have to be observed, and often a complex biological molecule might have nine or more stages of development. And, of course, there is another important aspect of biology where sequence is of critical importance—in embryology.[2]Whole text books are devoted to examining the correct sequence of human development, and when there is an error in this order, a clinical condition results. If you think embryology is totally linked with genetics you have to think again, because the errors which cause pathology are only between 10% and 15% genetic in origin, which means they are 90% something else!

Embryology, too, links to cavities, as we can see that a major part of early embryology is concerned with the cavities, and how they form and change as the embryo develops. I think that embryology is an energetic study on its own, and thus I think a thorough study of it should be done from the biophysics perspective. Embryology uses the first two principles I have outlined—of cavities and ordinality/sequence—together. And, therefore, it is no accident that the embryological development of all mammals has a common route, since the same laws of space will apply to all of them.

There is nothing new under the sun, since the Chinese in their traditional medicine realized that there was a special type of “source energy” (or yuan qi in Chinese) that was important for human development. You can check this out if you like in the major text on the subject called The Theoretical Foundations of Chinese Medicine.[3] So, so far, we have ZPE/Source energy plus cavities plus ordinality/sequence, and we have the basis for a new way of looking at what I might call bioenergetic embryology. In fact, we are at last starting to understand how biology works, maybe for the first time!

Now you will note a curious thing. I am not all that interested in the exchange of energy, except in a general way because this is what physics is really about. I am more interested in information exchanges, in how information is carried in or by space itself. Space may act as a sort of informational template for what the energy can do! In other words, I am going to a deeper level of looking at things, beyond energy to the information that underlies it. By the way, information is the hot new topic in physics, with many physicists, such as Anton Zeilinger, saying that information may be a “thing” in its own right, and indeed the most basic aspect of the universe, more basic than forces and fields and energy.

So now we go on to another incredible characteristic of space—its self-organizing ability. I call this property of space, or the process that can take place via space, “aggregation.” Aggregation is about scale and pattern—about emergence—with simpler or more holistic structures emerging from a flux of other structures are a smaller scale. Information transfer in nature would be incredibly complex if everything were just collections of spatial structures. Complex life would not be possible, because of the difficulty in powering its information systems. So we need to have a “self-simplifying” system in addition to a self-organizing one. This does not mean things are simple or easy. It only means that many small seemingly separate and chaotic patterns can emerge into a larger, more structured pattern. Think of water molecules in vapor form, zipping about every which way. Then as the temperature is lowered, structure emerges as water forms into ice. That’s one easy way to think of self-organization and emergence and aggregation.

But aggregation is more than the ability to self-simplify. It is the ability for two or more pieces of information to interact so as to form a third, different piece of information, from which emerges functions we might not expect from the functions of its constituent parts. Carbon and hydrogen and other kinds of atoms group in specific ways to create specific kinds of amino acids. Certain amino acids link in certain ways to form specific hormones. What emerges is wholly different in quality and function from what might be expected just by studying the parts from which it is made.

Things in nature are constructed according to a larger plan, except we don’t ever understand what the larger plan actually is. The larger plan probably consists of the laws of spatial arrangement and self-assembly. So in chemistry we see molecules that can self-assemble, and there are very elaborate explanations for how and why this happens, none of them very convincing in the long run. Chemistry explains what goes into life, but not what life is. Or why there is life at all. My point, however, is that this same process of emergence and aggregation happens on a larger scale in biology than conventional biologists will admit—on a scale so large that it includes the entire human body-field. The body-field self-assembles and self-repairs itself according to laws which we are only just beginning to understand. Aggregation is just one of those laws.