Energetic Medicine Articles - http://www.energetic-medicine.net/bioenergetic-articles
LIFE and MIND - in Search of the Physical Basis
http://www.energetic-medicine.net/bioenergetic-articles/articles/37/1/LIFE-and-MIND---in-Search-of-the-Physical-Basis/Page1.html
Savely Savva
Mechanical engineer and physical chemist. Editor of the book "LIFE and MIND - in Search of the Physical Basis. Founder and Exec. Director of the Monterey Institute for the Study of Alternative Healing Arts http://www.misaha.com 
By Savely Savva
Published on 12/3/2007
 
Contemporeary physics cannot explain emergence and existance of life. The book suggests experimental and theoretical approaches to broaden the paradigm.

Preface

PREFACE

This book is written for biologists, biochemists, biophysicists and physicists, but we hope it will be of interest to all educated people. It challenges current scientific paradigms, suggesting ways to develop a new physics that would include Life and Mind.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Alexander Bogdanov wrote in his “Tecktology — The General Science of Organizations” that the world is made of organizations of things, beings and ideas, and all organizations have mechanisms of self-protection and self-stabilization. Scientific communities currently are important and powerful organizations — they receive and distribute tremendous amounts of money that governments invest in security (military potentials), new energy sources, agriculture, medical care, etc. They must be stable to fulfill their function; however, the pursuit of stability is always associated with the suppression of freedom, freedom to introduce new and often controversial ideas.

During the transition period of the 1990s the Russian Academy of Sciences almost lost its function of funds distribution as there was a shortage of funds available to the government; consequently, the Academy lost control over the scientific community to some degree. Thanks to this development we have the opportunity to publish in this book the results of some very interesting experimental works such as: paradoxical effects of super-low concentrations of biologically active substances (by the Institute of Biochemical Physics, RAN); biological nuclear synthesis in growing bacterial cultures (by a group from Moscow State University and University of Kiev, Ukraine); and physical processes associated with telekinesis (in N. Sotina’s article) by different scientific groups. Nothing similar would be possible in the United States. Pioneering works such as Louis Kervran’s biological nuclear reactions, J. Benveniste’s memory of water, E. Macovschi’s biostructure, etc, — all of these subjects are “nonexistent” in the current peer-reviewed scientific literature. It seems that nobody even attempted to falsify these works because positive results would not be published in any “respectable” scientific journal and authors daring to publish them would lose government funding.

None of the American co-authors of this book were funded by the United States Government. But let us remember that many of the greatest contributions to human culture were made by aristocrats who were not concerned with making a living. This effect of Russian “freedom” should be a valuable lesson for all governments and academies.

Contemporary biomedical science does not seem to have any concept of, and ignores the need for an understanding of the organism’s general control system. Society pays for this by human lives and by the growing economic burden of the healthcare system. But biologists and biochemists who try to reduce the control function to local chemical (electrical) interactions are not to blame — the root of the problem is the inadequacy of contemporary physics.

Contemporary physics does not have any meaningful explanation for how life emerged (on the Earth or elsewhere) and how it maintains itself, or what is the physical carrier of the fundamental programs of life — development, maintenance, reproduction, and death — on which the information is re-encoded from the genome, the chemical carrier. Currently known physical forces cannot explain how the mother’s body or, for that matter, a beehive, controls embryogenesis, or what controls collective behavior of an ant colony. Chemical signals found in many biological processes — from cellular physiology, to bacterial colonies regulation, to animals’ sexual behavior (pheromones) — are no more than signals of the most complex programs that control life.

Scientists, and many other thoughtful people, know that our knowledge about the Universe can be compared to a harbor in an ocean of the unknown, especially as related to the phenomenon of life. This book is not intended to consider the entire mysterious ocean of the unknown. Yet, it will show that the problem of the general control system of the organism is at least “touchable,” and the accumulated experimental and theoretical work presented here can serve as a guide for further development of science.

Almost all co-authors, especially Drs. Bockris, Tiller and Sotina, participated in discussing contents of other articles presented in this book. Also, great assistance came from Dr. Jim Clegg, Professor of cellular biology at the University of California, Davis, and Dr. Garret Yount and Kanny Rachlin of the California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, who helped in editing biological articles. We greatly appreciate the technical editing of the material by Felix Heidrick, a master of creating camera-ready electronic formats.

All co-authors hope that this book will sooner or later catch the attention of the scientific community and will stimulate further progress in science.

Savely Savva, Editor


Flyer by Trafford


LIFE and MIND—In Search of the Physical Basis, Edited by Savely Savva. MISAHA/Trafford Publishing, 2007. 262 pp. $40.00 (paperback). ISBN 1–4251–1090–8.

Available from Trafford: http://www.trafford.com/06-2849
Available from Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Life-Mind-Search-Physical-Basis... or
Arrange a personal copy from Mr. Savva by contacting him directly. Please see the Donate page.

 

        Genetic information carries four fundamental programs of life: development, maintenance, reproduction, and death, but these programs operate not on a chemical level, i.e., not by direct chemical interactions with genes. Dr. Craig Venter very thoughtfully mentioned this at the TV announcement of the deciphering of the human genome in 2000. This “different level of organization”— the Biofield Control System (BCS) of the organism — is a hierarchical structure that includes the whole organism, organs, tissues and cells. It also includes the mind (at the organism level) that materializes all fundamental programs of life in behavior.
        Ignoring the role of the BCS impairs biomedical science and pharmacology and consequently the social health care system. But the root of the problem is in the insufficiency of contemporary Newtonian physics which does not have any concept of the physical interactions responsible for emergence and existence of life.
        The book suggests some ways to approach the problem. It consists of three parts: I — Concept of the biofield control system, its structure and its history; II — Experimental observations, and III — Alternative physical models.
        The concept of the biofield has a century-long history. It was engendered by developmental biologists in opposition to the strictly genetic, biochemical approach (Prof. L. Beloussov, Moscow State University with a Commentary by American Professors J. Opitz and S. Gilbert) and was independently introduced by the Romanian biochemist E. Machovschi in the 1950s – 1970s as the “biostructure” (Prof. G. Drochioui, Romanian University). The structure of the BCS and its function suggest that the physical carrier of the BCS cannot be reduced to any of the currently known fundamental physical interactions (S. Savva).
        Experimental observations include confirmation of the biological nuclear synthesis introduced by Louis Kervran (Dr. A. Kornilova, Moscow State University, and Prof. V. Vysotsky, Ukraine State University); water interaction with hydrophobic liquids (S. Savva); paradoxical effects of super low doses of biologically active substances on living systems (Prof. E. Burlakova et al. Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences); and communications between living systems (Prof. J. Kiang, Walter Read Army Institute of Research and C. Backster, Backster Foundation). These observations indicate that the physical carrier (or carriers) of BCS must have both energy and informational qualities and that it is (they are) capable of interacting with the currently known fundamental physical forces.
        Alternative theoretical physical models presented and referred to in the book reveal the inadequacy of the current scientific paradigm (Dr. J. Bockris and Dr. H. Puthoff), suggest a five-dimensional space-time model (J. Beichler), an eleven-dimensional space-time model (Prof. W. Tiller) and a concept of stable structures in superfluid vacuum (Dr. N. Sotina, Moscow State University).

 


Preface

PREFACE

This book is written for biologists, biochemists, biophysicists and physicists, but we hope it will be of interest to all educated people. It challenges current scientific paradigms, suggesting ways to develop a new physics that would include Life and Mind.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Alexander Bogdanov wrote in his “Tecktology — The General Science of Organizations” that the world is made of organizations of things, beings and ideas, and all organizations have mechanisms of self-protection and self-stabilization. Scientific communities currently are important and powerful organizations — they receive and distribute tremendous amounts of money that governments invest in security (military potentials), new energy sources, agriculture, medical care, etc. They must be stable to fulfill their function; however, the pursuit of stability is always associated with the suppression of freedom, freedom to introduce new and often controversial ideas.

During the transition period of the 1990s the Russian Academy of Sciences almost lost its function of funds distribution as there was a shortage of funds available to the government; consequently, the Academy lost control over the scientific community to some degree. Thanks to this development we have the opportunity to publish in this book the results of some very interesting experimental works such as: paradoxical effects of super-low concentrations of biologically active substances (by the Institute of Biochemical Physics, RAN); biological nuclear synthesis in growing bacterial cultures (by a group from Moscow State University and University of Kiev, Ukraine); and physical processes associated with telekinesis (in N. Sotina’s article) by different scientific groups. Nothing similar would be possible in the United States. Pioneering works such as Louis Kervran’s biological nuclear reactions, J. Benveniste’s memory of water, E. Macovschi’s biostructure, etc, — all of these subjects are “nonexistent” in the current peer-reviewed scientific literature. It seems that nobody even attempted to falsify these works because positive results would not be published in any “respectable” scientific journal and authors daring to publish them would lose government funding.

None of the American co-authors of this book were funded by the United States Government. But let us remember that many of the greatest contributions to human culture were made by aristocrats who were not concerned with making a living. This effect of Russian “freedom” should be a valuable lesson for all governments and academies.

Contemporary biomedical science does not seem to have any concept of, and ignores the need for an understanding of the organism’s general control system. Society pays for this by human lives and by the growing economic burden of the healthcare system. But biologists and biochemists who try to reduce the control function to local chemical (electrical) interactions are not to blame — the root of the problem is the inadequacy of contemporary physics.

Contemporary physics does not have any meaningful explanation for how life emerged (on the Earth or elsewhere) and how it maintains itself, or what is the physical carrier of the fundamental programs of life — development, maintenance, reproduction, and death — on which the information is re-encoded from the genome, the chemical carrier. Currently known physical forces cannot explain how the mother’s body or, for that matter, a beehive, controls embryogenesis, or what controls collective behavior of an ant colony. Chemical signals found in many biological processes — from cellular physiology, to bacterial colonies regulation, to animals’ sexual behavior (pheromones) — are no more than signals of the most complex programs that control life.

Scientists, and many other thoughtful people, know that our knowledge about the Universe can be compared to a harbor in an ocean of the unknown, especially as related to the phenomenon of life. This book is not intended to consider the entire mysterious ocean of the unknown. Yet, it will show that the problem of the general control system of the organism is at least “touchable,” and the accumulated experimental and theoretical work presented here can serve as a guide for further development of science.

Almost all co-authors, especially Drs. Bockris, Tiller and Sotina, participated in discussing contents of other articles presented in this book. Also, great assistance came from Dr. Jim Clegg, Professor of cellular biology at the University of California, Davis, and Dr. Garret Yount and Kanny Rachlin of the California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, who helped in editing biological articles. We greatly appreciate the technical editing of the material by Felix Heidrick, a master of creating camera-ready electronic formats.

All co-authors hope that this book will sooner or later catch the attention of the scientific community and will stimulate further progress in science.

Savely Savva, Editor