- Home
- Bioenergetic Devices
- Random Event Generators and Bioenergetic Health Screening Devices
- Home
- Consciousness in Technology
- Random Event Generators and Bioenergetic Health Screening Devices
Random Event Generators and Bioenergetic Health Screening Devices
- By Harry Massey
- Published 09/8/2007
- Bioenergetic Devices
-
Rating:




Research carried out since 1979 by Robert Jahn and Brenda Dunne at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research lab, located at Princeton University, has demonstrated that mind can influence physical processes, causing random events to become less random to a small but statistically significant degree. The effects are minor, but undeniable. In tens of thousands of trials, Jahn and Dunne asked subjects to use their intention to try to influence randomly generated events, such as a computer spewing out a series of completely random strings of 0s and 1s, so that there would be more 0s or more 1s than there would be otherwise. In this and other types of tests the results revealed that subjects were able to influence the event to become non-random. It is important to note that the processes in Jahn’s lab were absolutely random, and not what is called “pseudo” random, which is a process that is not perfectly random but only appears to be.
What does this research have to do with health? It allows us to see that a client’s consciousness can affect matter, including his or her physical body and state of health. In terms of bioenergetic technology, the REG links the client’s consciousness at a quantum level to the scanning process, indicating a “start” point for the quantum interface between client and computer.
Bioenergetic health screening devices took a great leap forward with the advent of computer technology. Originally, practitioners using electro-point-probe systems had to use ampoules of various substances to test against the client’s body, in a laborious and notoriously imperfect system. With the advent of computers, the ampoules were no longer necessary as the information could be programmed directly into the software. In effect, language (albeit programming language) not ampoules was used to match against. But that meant that thousands of bits of information had to be programmed into the computer and the test was still time-consuming. In many cases, the match was also less than reliable, and they could only be made for what was programmed into the computer. Obviously, not everything could be.
It has been somewhat difficult to trace who first used an REG as a switch between the “real” and the “virtual” in an energetic health screening device, but it may have been a man named De Borge a Hungarian scientist whose diagnostic software gave meaningful results.
The technique was expanded by Bill Nelson and his eclosion device, and subsequent EPFX, QXCI and SCIO versions. These devices use a pseudo random event generator and a Borland database of test items.
A number of other people and companies developed technologies along similar lines—using computers instead of physical samples, such as the ampoules. These include Nutri-Eneregtics Systems (NES), Quantec, MARS, CoRe, Oberon and MetascanSpread The Word
Article Series
-
Random Event Generators and Bioenergetic Health Screening Devices
Comments




